|
In the extreme southeast corner of Georgia, Camden County voters will go to polls today through March 8 to vote on whether to repeal the actions of their commissioners to purchase property to build a spaceport. The spaceport notion originally surfaced almost seven years ago. At first, a space launch facility might have seemed like a good idea, but as Camden County residents learned more about the project, doubts set in. A number of issues have surfaced that indicate this project may not be ready to launch.
Camden County has a population just shy of 55,000, and grew by almost 8% in the last decade. It includes the cities of St. Marys, Kingsland, and Woodbine, its county seat. It is the seventh largest Georgia county in square miles. Many Georgians know this area because St. Marys is the departure point to visit Cumberland Island, Georgia’s largest and most southern barrier island and site of Cumberland Island National Seashore. As with much of our 100 miles of coast, Camden County, is a beautiful live oak-shaded area, with slow moving rivers and evocative marshlands lining the coastline. It is also the site of one of the worst industrial accidents in the U.S. Fifty years ago the Thiokol Chemical Co., which made trip flares for use in the Vietnam War, suffered a massive chemical explosion, killing 29 workers, mostly women of color. Today, Camden County is on the verge of purchasing from Union Carbide almost 5,000 acres that includes some of the former Thiokol land to develop the spaceport.
The county has long had an interest in space launches. It was the runner-up to Cape Canaveral for the Apollo moon program in the 1960s; the King’s Bay Naval Submarine Base is located in the county. Like most counties, especially rural ones, Camden County is always looking for economic development projects, so the idea of a spaceport is appealing.
The Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, is the best known spaceport in the U.S. But other spaceports serve both government and private commercial launches. There are 35 facilities worldwide that can launch spacecraft or satellites into orbit or sub-orbit. Of these,13 FAA-licensed spaceport launch sites are in the U.S. These facilities have different capacities and capabilities. And most significantly for Camden, these sites have experienced different levels of financial success. Originally the purview only of the government, commercial investment in space, including space tourism, is relatively new. Some worry our country is already saturated with too many spaceports, and too little demand for launches. This article provides some detail about the supply and demand of spaceports, including an example of the nearby spaceport that Jacksonville, Florida, added onto its existing airport. It has not yet had its first launch in the 12 years since receiving FAA approval.
Even if the market could support another spaceport, there are a number of concerns about the site in Camden County. First, the Union Carbide site under consideration for purchase is heavily polluted. It includes a hazardous waste site. Since the mid 1960s, the property the county proposes to buy and adjacent acreage has been used for military ordnance, pesticides and speciality chemicals. Citizens fear any construction for the spaceport on this site will stir up and release hazardous pollutants into the air and water.
Camden’s proposed site is the only spaceport in the U.S. that would be launching over an occupied area. The risk of rocket launch failures is expected to be around 20% for the type of rockets the FAA has approved for Camden County. Because of this risk, residents within the launch path would be required to evacuate or sign a release for each launch.
This evacuation requirement would adversely impact the National Park Service’s Cumberland Island National Seashore. Since the FAA has approved up to 12 launches per year, a launch “window” could average a week each month. Cumberland Island would have to be off limits to visitors during planned launches. Such a requirement would severely limit access to this pristine and popular island. The National Park Service, in a 2015 letter giving comments to the Environmental Impact Statement for this spaceport, outlined the difficulties of evacuations of the island and asked that alternative sites be considered before FAA approval is issued. There is no indication that this was ever done.
|