An anti-VEGF a month keeps the ophthalmologist away, but which one? The CATT trials looked to assess the relative safety and efficacy of two treatments for subfoveal neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Most AMD-related blindness is attributable to choroidal neovascularization and therefore anti-VEGF therapy treatment was a crucial development in the fight to improve visual outcomes. In the CATT trial, patients with AMD (n=1185) were randomized to receive either intraocular injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab (a cheaper, off-label alternative) at either a monthly or as needed regimen. Those patients in the monthly arm of the trial were equally divided again after 1 year to either remain monthly or switch to as needed.
Key Points:
- Ranibizumab and bevacizumab had similar effects on visual acuity (mean increase in letters of visual acuity from baseline was 8.8 in the ranibizumab-monthly group, 7.8 in the bevacizumab-monthly group, 6.7 in the ranibizumab-as-needed group, and 5.0 in the bevacizumab-as-needed group)
- Switching to as-needed treatment after one year of monthly treatment yielded outcomes nearly equal to those obtained with as-needed treatment for the full two years, with the mean number of injections was 5.0 for ranibizumab-treated patients and 5.8 for bevacizumab-treated patients
- There were no differences between the two drugs in rates of death or arteriothrombotic events, which are sometimes associated with systemic anti-VEGF treatment for cancer
The CATT was the first multicenter and largest trial to compare bevacizumab to ranibizumab (the more expensive, yet standard of the time). This study was crucial to establish the differences and similarities of the two drugs, primarily the non-inferiority of bevacizumab on similar treatment frequencies.
|
|
In our global ophthalmology efforts to fight blindness, providing adequate early cataract surgery, which constitutes 50% of world preventable blindness, is critical.
Which one of these conditions are public health measures, according to the Vision2020 initiative, still least effective in treating:
8.7.3
|
|
A. Trachoma
B. Xerophthalmia
C. Onchocerciasis
D. Glaucoma
8.7.3
|
|
|
|