Copy
View this email in your browser
Retromat Logo

Hello <<Your Given Name>>!

Phases are not always linear in retrospectives

This one is for people new to retrospectives:

You might already be familiar with the 5 phases from “Agile Retrospectives” by Derby and Larsen:

  1. Set the stage
  2. Gather data
  3. Generate insight
  4. Decide what to do
  5. Close the retrospective

Whenever I talk about them and in all the material I’ve created, it always looks like the phases are strictly linear. But that is not how they work in the majority of my retrospectives – because I rarely have single-topic retros. I usually run a “gathering potential topics”-activity like “Speedboat” or “I like, I wish” and then the team works through 2 or 3 of these topics.

It would be strange to first talk about 3 topics in depth and afterwards come up with action items for all of them. Instead we talk about 1 topic in depth and create an action item for this topic. And only then start with the next topic. Like in this highly elaborate diagram:

I thought it might be worth stating this explicitly as it’s not necessarily obvious for beginners.

Happy Holidays,

Corinna


PPS: You think someone else might be interested in this email? Forward it! If they want more stuff like it, they can subscribe here.
Copyright © 2018 Corinna Baldauf - Finding-Marbles.com, All rights reserved.


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp